Accidents & InjuriesAccidental Death Airplane Accidents Amusement Park Injuries Automobile Accidents Bicycle Accidents Birthing Injuries Boating & Water Accidents Burn Injury Bus Accidents Common Carrier Liability Construction Site Injuries Defective Medical Devices Defective Product Dog Bites Drunk Drivers Elder Abuse Electrocution Traumatic Head & Brain Injury Maritime Injury Motorcycle Accidents Motorized Scooter Injury Oilfield Accident Pedestrian Accidents Planes, Trains, Buses Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Caused by Fen Phen Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) School Bus Accidents Slip and Fall / Premises Liability Spinal Cord Injury Swimming Pool Injuries Train Accidents SUV Rollovers Traumatic Head & Brain Injury Trucking Accidents Wage Compensation Work Injuries Wrongful DeathHot TopicsReglan Yaz/ Yasmine/ Ocella Birth Control Pill Defense Base Act Claim/ Workers Injured Overseas Cochlear Ear Implants/ Advanced Bionics Corporation Bed Sores - Decubitus Ulcers Gynecare Prolift, Bard Avaulta System Fosamax Causing Fractured Femur in Women Intelence Linked To Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Hospital Staff Infection MRSA Infection Cases Chantix/Zyban Zimmer Durom Cup HYDROXYCUT® Products Recalled Zyprexa Peanut Butter Recall 2009 Yamaha Rhino ATV Shoulder Pain Pump Construction Site Injuries Byetta Dangerous Side Effects Thoratic Heart Mate II Recall Crib Recall Composix Kugel Mesh Patch Recall Taxus Stent Recall ReNu Fungal Eye Infections Fosamax Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Ortho Evra Birth Control Patch Guidant Defibrillator Implants St. Jude Defibrillator Medtronic Pacemaker Medtronic Defibrillator Defective Sprint Fidelis Lead Recall Guidant Pacemaker Children's Motrin Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Benzene Exposure Vinyl Chloride Exposure Beryllium Disease Smith & Nephew Knee Replacement Bowflex Recall Guidant Ancure Aortoiliac System Guidant Ancure Endograft System Motor Vehicle Crashworthiness Treadmill Recall Kidney Dialysis Side Effects Duragesic Patch/Fentanyl Overdose Tequin Side Effects AMO Multi Purpose Solution RecallDangerous DrugsAccutane: Recalled Digitek Levaquin: Liver Failure and Death Nuva Ring Avandia Diabetes drug: Heart attack Fleet Phospho Zelnorm Permax Recall Trasylol: Heart attack, stroke and kidney failure Strattera Crestor Ketek: Liver failure, death Ketek Overview Bextra Serzone Vioxx Injury Zicam Drug Products Liability Daypro Ortho Evra Birth Control Patch: Blood clots and death Palladone Remicade: Immune suppression and infectious complications Serevent Death Paxil Zithromax Side Effects Risperdal: Insulin dependent diabetes, Tardive Dyskinesia, gynecomastia Gadolinium/Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF)Insurance IssuesBank Annuity Sales Fraud Insurance Bad Faith Insurance Fraud Title-Insurance Fraud Unumprovident / Denial of Benefits Denial of Long-Term Care InsuranceOther Types of ClaimsAsbestos/Mesothelioma Lead Paint Exposure Negligent Security Product Recall Information Social Security Claims Toxic Molds Medical Malpractice Human Tissue Recall Tissue Transplant Recall |
Drug-Coated Stents Show Use RiskStudy Says Devices by J&J, Boston Scientific Present A Higher Danger of Clots October 24, 2006 Both major brands of drug-coated stent pose a higher risk for patients of developing blood clots months later than do traditional metal stents, according to data presented at a big cardiology meeting this week. Boston Scientific Corp., the largest manufacturer by market share of cardiac stents, had already acknowledged a small but statistically higher risk of clots for its Taxus stent. But Johnson & Johnson, second in the stent market, had stated that, while the number of stent clots was numerically higher for its Cypher stent, the difference wasn't statistically significant. In response to the latest findings, a J&J spokesman said the data "are subject to interpretation by a number of methodologies, some of which may yield significant differences at certain time points." The company also said that data from the company's trials would be presented today based on "new standardized definitions" of stent clots, known in medical parlance as stent thrombosis. The definitions have been created by a consortium of academics, manufacturers and regulators, and the analysis "will provide important insights into the thrombosis rates for the Cypher stent," the company said. The results add fuel to an already heated debate over the formation of blood clots inside drug-coated stents. Stents are tiny wire meshes deployed inside arteries after clearing blockages. Unlike metal stents, those coated with drugs prevent the gradual growth of scar tissue in the artery, a process called restenosis. But a body of evidence is growing that they also increase the incidence of blood clots inside the stents, which often lead to major heart attacks. At the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics meeting in Washington, D.C., updated thrombosis figures were presented for Boston Scientific and J&J's drug-coated stents, showing a similar and statistically significant risk of clots happening months after implantation. J&J, New Brunswick, N.J., and Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass., provided raw data for the four major Cypher clinical trials, involving about 1,800 patients, and the five major Taxus trials, involving about 3,500 patients, to Gregg Stone and Martin Leon, researchers at Columbia University and co-organizers of the meeting. Dr. Stone is also principal investigator of the major Taxus trials, while Dr. Leon has played a similar role with the Cypher studies. The researchers' analysis of the thrombosis data, presented by Dr. Stone, showed that between one and four years after implantation the Cypher stent had a statistically significant, additional clot risk of 0.6% while the Taxus' risk was 0.4%. That's an extra two to three people per 500 suffering from a stent blood clot compared with bare-metal stents. The risk, while small, is meaningful on a public-health level since some four million people have had the devices implanted world-wide and stent blood clots are believed to cause major heart attacks and deaths about 70% of the time. Some of the new definitions to be unveiled today, which consider certain deaths and heart attacks as thrombosis-related without actual confirmation that the events were caused by a blood clot, could add enough "noise" to companies' thrombosis tallies to minimize the differences between metal stents and drug-coated stents. But Dr. Stone says he believes the risk of thrombosis "looks real" and warned against using definitions "that obscure" this effect. According to Boston Scientific, the benefits of its drug-coated stent in preventing restenosis offset the higher risk of thrombosis. The stent's ability to reduce restenosis spares many patients from heart attacks, it says. As of 4 p.m. composite trading yesterday on the New York Stock Exchange, J&J was at $69.10, up 48 cents, and Boston Scientific was at $16.14, off 10 cents. If we accept your case against Boston Scientific we will represent you on a contingency basis which means our fee is solely contingent on obtaining a successful recovery for our stent victims. Please immediately contact an experienced attorney at Nadrich & Cohen or click here to complete an internet inquiry for assistance at no cost or obligation to you. Otherwise, please call us at (800) 718-4658.
|
Complete and submit this form and we will contact you shortly.
Do I Have A Case?
Please be aware that the transmission of an e-mail inquiry itself does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Law Offices of Toll Free: (800) 718-4658
Although Nadrich & Cohen's offices are located in California, the firm is engaged representing clients in their home states throughout the country.
|
|
Copyright © 2007 - Law Offices of Nadrich & Cohen, LLP - Defective Taxus Stent Lawyers - Taxus Stent Recall Attorneys - Defective Medical Device Lawyers - serving the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco and the Bay Area. All rights reserved. Disclaimer Taxus Stent Recall Attorney Disclaimer: The California defective product, Taxus Stent, Boston Scientific Taxus Stent, defective medical device, faulty stent, product liability, wrongful death, or other legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth herein are based upon the facts of that particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. Please contact a California stent recall Lawyer or dangerous product Attorney for a consultation on your particular personal injury matter. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the state of California. |